Page 229 of 284 FirstFirst ... 129179219227228229230231239279 ... LastLast
Results 2,281 to 2,290 of 2840

Thread: best antenna

  1. #2281
    First officer
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Farnborough, UK
    Posts
    204
    Could you shed a little more light on your design, I'm not quite getting how you going to keep the two half waves away from the quarter.

    i have access to a VNA so i could test it.
    T-EGLF8

  2. #2282
    Passenger
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    14
    Sorry for not answering sooner... business is taking over ... as well as preparing flying since decent weather is on its way :-)

    The idea of the above design is to use the work developed by the authors in the links below.
    The simplest form of a collinear is to have stacked vertical half waves that radiates in phase, separated vertically by approx half wave.
    The simplest solution to feed (connect) the radiating vertical half waves in phase is to use a very thin wire which is also a half wave. The radiating half waves are large diameter and the phase lines are small diameter.
    If the large diameter elements are in phase and the small diameter elements are out of phase with the large diameter elements, radiation from the large diameter elements dominate.
    Because the antenna is for receiving only, the phasing lines can use very small diameter without introducing any significant loss.

    On the drawing, the lower half wave is center feed which makes matching to 50-75 Ohms more easy.
    Using large diameter copper for the radiating elements helps reduce the antenna impedance at resonance and accentuate the ratio between radiating and phasing elements diameters to further minimize radiation from phasing lines.
    You can see the lower half wave like the spider antenna which has been described before, at the end of which is connected a half wave phasing line which is connected to a half wave large diameter radiating line.
    Adjusting the angle of the "spider legs" allows to adjust the impedance at resonance.
    The below antenna should provide around 2-3 dB of gain compared to the spider antenna.
    To improve radiation pattern, it might be a good idea to add a second ground plane, a quarter wave below the feed point of the lower half wave (65-70 mm below in our case).
    coli jld2.png
    Adding 3 radiating half waves above the spider should provide 5-6 dB of gain compared to the spider antenna.
    In order to improve further the low angle radiation, it would be worth to try reducing progressively the diameter of the radiating elements (for example 10mm, 8mm, 6mm and 4mm for a 4 half wave vertical)
    coli jld3.png
    All this is theory and should be validated by experimentation.
    The beauty compared to the coaxial version is that it does not depend from coaxial cable VF and it should be easy to construct with repeatable performance.

    https://www.engr.colostate.edu/~nota...20Antennas.pdf
    http://home.comcast.net/~ross_anderson/sc.htm

  3. #2283
    Passenger borchi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Berlin (Germany)
    Posts
    1
    Hallo,

    i build one of these cantennas for my Raspberry PI & DVB-T Stick Combo. It works good. With the antenna from the stick i got 4-6 planes, now i have 15 planes...

    When the WiFi modules arrives i will place the reciever in a other room...

    Happy Easter
    Last edited by borchi; 2015-04-04 at 12:03.

  4. #2284
    First officer
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Aldershot, Hampshire. UK
    Posts
    262
    Jld,
    An interesting design, however it would be wrong to call it a collinear as it is effectively a single wire, in operation it would be more akin to a single ended franklin with the phasing stubs straightened out, you could make this more compact and possibly better performing by folding the phasing stubs out at 90 degrees and coiling them round in 7/8th of a circle.
    That would almost half the overall length, and you could still run a glass fibre pole through the center of it for support.
    One additional problem that I can see is that the large diameter elements make this quite wideband so you may pick up out of band signals and overload the front end if you use it with an RTL dongle or similar, these tend to work best with a well tuned narrowband antenna.
    Ben.
    FR24 F-EGLF1, Blitzortung station 878, OGN Aldersht2, PilotAware PWAldersht, PlanePlotter M7.

  5. #2285
    Captain abcd567's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Toronto CYYZ
    Posts
    2,837
    Quote Originally Posted by borchi View Post
    Hallo,

    i build one of these cantennas for my Raspberry PI & DVB-T Stick Combo. It works good. With the antenna from the stick i got 4-6 planes, now i have 15 planes...

    When the WiFi modules arrives i will place the reciever in a other room...

    Happy Easter
    Willkommen an Bord. Suggest you read these threads for Beginners:

    3 EASY ANTENNAS FOR BEGINNERS

    Raspberry Pi: How To Install Raspian OS, Dump1090, FR24 Data Feeder

  6. #2286
    Captain abcd567's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Toronto CYYZ
    Posts
    2,837
    @JLD:
    @F-EGLF1
    The design proposed by JLD is worth experimenting. It is a collinear antenna, though looks different from conventional collinears. Antenna height is not a problem as at 1090 MHz the wavelength & hence element length is small. This design most suits Printed Citcuit Board antenna - half wavelength long alternating wide & narrow strips of copper on PCB.
    Last edited by abcd567; 2015-04-05 at 03:53.

  7. #2287
    Captain abcd567's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Toronto CYYZ
    Posts
    2,837
    A HYBRID OF SPIDER & FRANKLIN
    This is a conceptual design only, not yet built & tested
    Hybrid Spider Antenna SO239 640x1640.jpg
    Last edited by abcd567; 2015-04-06 at 16:55.

  8. #2288
    First officer
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Farnborough, UK
    Posts
    204
    @JLD thanks for the info, i get it now. My brain got stuck on a particular path which didn't work for me
    T-EGLF8

  9. #2289
    Passenger
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    14
    Indeed it is using a similar concept to printed antennas.
    The reason for this approach is to make something very easy to build which is not sensitive to construction details, while providing gain over dipole or ground plane.

    The large diameter radiating elements are less sensitive to length since and still provide a rather narrow bandwidth when stacked.
    They also make the radiating impedance lower which allows to get the ground plane wires closer to vertical, contributing to lower the radiation angle toward the horizon.

    Phasing lines can be complex to design and build. In your example above, the exact length is probably not a half wave and the diameter of the wire, the radius of the bents and the separation between the horizontal sections play a critical role, making this difficult to build.

    Also the idea to fold the phasing line is only interesting when it is desired to shorten the physical length of the antenna but it lowers the gain by up to 2dB when stacking 4 half waves.
    Analysis have shown that the optimum vertical spacing is between .4-.5 wave length separation between the half waves.
    In your example of three stacked half waves, with close spacing between the vertical half waves, the gain over a single vertical half wave should be 3.5 dB when it would be just above 5db if vertical separation was between .4 and .5 wave length.
    The is the reason why using the principle of thin wires cut to exactly a half wave length (thin wires have a VF of 1) to create the phasing line should work well, making an easy construct while provide close to optimum spacing to get max gain.

    Need to leave for airfield now.
    Will try to build tonight.

    JL

  10. #2290
    Captain abcd567's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Toronto CYYZ
    Posts
    2,837
    @JLD:
    @SpaxmoidJAm:

    Waiting for test /trial run results after you build it.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •