Page 177 of 285 FirstFirst ... 77127167175176177178179187227277 ... LastLast
Results 1,761 to 1,770 of 2846

Thread: best antenna

  1. #1761
    Captain abcd567's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Toronto CYYZ
    Posts
    2,854
    Well, a trimmer capacitor of 1.5 pF may not be available as most of trimmers have minimum value 3 to 5pF.

    Why not use a small piece of coax as capacitor, core making one plate of capacitor, shield making the second plate.

    Since RG6 with FPE insulation has core-to-sheild capacitance of 53pF per meter length, to make a 1.5pF capacitor, a piece of coax of length = 1000x1.5pF/53pF = 28mm will be required.

    Last edited by abcd567; 2014-10-15 at 02:28.

  2. #1762
    Passenger
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    32
    the challenge is that the impedance of the antenna will "transform" as you move along the transmission line ;in all cases execpt where a perfect match occurs of Zl=Zo (tranmission line and load have same impedance)
    hence depending on the location chosen to attach the capacitor, indeed at the given point it may need inductance.
    this is explained if you look up "single stub matching"
    im guessing (only) that if the simulation provides an indication of inductive reactance at the feed point,
    then fitting a capacitor at this same feed point would indeed enable the reactance to be cancelled, although this
    would not match the resistive part ... hence there could still be a mismatch between the tranmission line and antenna impedance. (im avoiding getting into smith chart theory and practise here)
    the objective of correctly matching an antenna to feedline, is to not only have reactive component zero but also resistive component equal to tranmission line. (at which point maximum power transfer occurs)
    ... so your suggestion would certainly enable tuning the reactive component to zero (assuming it was attached at an
    inductive point on feedline/feedpoint) but would not help any resistive component mismatch...

  3. #1763
    Captain abcd567's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Toronto CYYZ
    Posts
    2,854
    Thinking loud...DIY situation mostly does not have test equipment.

    If coco element length is less than optimum, gain will be lower & swr will be higher, both bad.

    If coco element length is higher than optimum, gain will be higher & swr will be higher. Both are not bad, only one is bad.

    So if length error is positive, it is better than negetive length error.

    Lets make a coco with elements deliberately made higher than stsndard formula. We are better off for gain, but poor in swr. Now we add a LC Pi, L or T with a variable capacitor. Let DIY hobbyist turn the spindle of variable capacitor to reduce SWR like we tune an FM or AM station, without any test equipment. We judge from output: in FM/AM by sound we listen, here by Range we get.

  4. #1764
    Captain abcd567's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Toronto CYYZ
    Posts
    2,854
    Quote Originally Posted by gregy View Post
    ... so your suggestion would certainly enable tuning the reactive component to zero (assuming it was attached at an
    inductive point on feedline/feedpoint) but would not help any resistive component mismatch...
    Both antenna reactance & antenna resistance vary with element length. That is why my first step was to choose (from simulation impedance graph) an element length which gives resistance = 75 ohm.

    Second step was to read the value of reactance for this element length, and add a capacitor if antenna reactance is +ve (inductive) or inductor if it is -ve (capacitive).

    The reactance of added capacitance or inductance should be equal & opposite to antenna reactance. This way we can make reactance=0 & resistance=75 ohm, a perfect match.

    EXAMPLE: 4-Element CoCo made of RG6 coax, FPE insulation, 0.83 VF

    Last edited by abcd567; 2014-10-16 at 05:55.

  5. #1765
    Captain abcd567's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Toronto CYYZ
    Posts
    2,854
    CoCo Impedance Matching by Simulation:

    The 4nec2 Simulation software provides:

    (1) Values of inductor or capacitor (as the case may be) for series & parallel compensation.




    (2) Values of Inductors & Capacitors in L, Pi or T matching networks.




    Note: above screenshots are for 4-element, RG6 FPE insulated VF 0.83 - element length = 1/2 x 275 x 0.83 = 114mm.

    .

  6. #1766
    Captain abcd567's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Toronto CYYZ
    Posts
    2,854
    Rein the Wild DIY CoCo

    Since the SWR of CoCo is very sensitive to element length, in DIY situation which lacks proper test equipment, it rarely happens that a CoCo with reasonably low SWR is made. As a result the maximum range in most cases is moderate to poor.

    Changing the length of elements in small steps is one option to improve SWR/Range, but very tedious, and will make most DIY enthusiast to quit. Further it is not known, in any particular situation, weather to increase or to decrease the length of elements.

    The other option is to use an impedance matching network with VARIABLE capacitor or VARIABLE Inductor, and try to achieve matching by adjusting the variable capacitor/inductor. This is similar to tuning an AM/FM Radio by turning its tuning knob. This is far more easy than trimming the elements, and suits DIY enthusiasts.
    Last edited by abcd567; 2014-10-17 at 18:35.

  7. #1767
    Captain abcd567's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Toronto CYYZ
    Posts
    2,854
    (1) These antenna tuners are NOT for ADS-B. These are for Amateur Radio, but give a fairly good idea to those who are not familiar with antenna tuner.
    (2) These tuners are adjustable to a wide range of frequencies. The CoCo tuner we want is for a narrow band of frequencies and therefore should be much simpler than these ones.

    The $20 eBay Antenna Tuner Kit Assembly and Review - Part 1


    DIY VHF ANTENNA TUNER made from junk


    How Antenna Tuners Work - KK4WW & N4USA

  8. #1768
    Captain abcd567's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Toronto CYYZ
    Posts
    2,854
    4-Element CoCo made of coax RG6 FPE insulation 0.83 VF element length 114mm

    (1) Without Impedance Mtching
    SWR=5.03, impedance = 181-j181 ohms - heavily reactive and far from 75 ohms








    (2) After inserting an Antenna Tuner - a matching L-network at the point where feed cable meets the CoCo
    SWR=1.01, impedance = 75.7-j0.75 ohms - almost 75 ohms pure resistive



  9. #1769
    Captain abcd567's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Toronto CYYZ
    Posts
    2,854
    Dead End
    After struggling to make an antenna tuner, I realized that due to GHz frequency, the Variable Capacitors & Inductors required are so tiny (fraction of pF & uH), that these are not manufactures and not avaialble.
    The new ray of hope to use an antenna tuner to match coco impedance has died.

  10. #1770
    Purser
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    South Oxfordshire
    Posts
    141
    Nice try ab cd. I await your next brain wave.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •