Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 74

Thread: NEW JUST OUT FLIGHTAWARE DONGLE

  1. #21
    Captain abcd567's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Toronto CYYZ
    Posts
    2,882
    @dudesjp
    Did you adjust the gain of dump1090? The default "max" is 49.6 dB. Try 45 dB and then 42 dB, most likely it will improve your range.

    If you have dump1090-mutability, use this command to change gain setting.
    Code:
    sudo dpkg-reconfigure dump1090-mutability
    See this page:
    http://flightaware.com/adsb/prostick/setup/

    .
    Last edited by abcd567; 2016-07-07 at 17:11.

  2. #22
    Captain Anmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,384
    Quote Originally Posted by dudesjp View Post
    I noticed that my range increased a little, but nothing significant!
    Looking at your two polar diagrams, it looks like you've gained some useful extra range. That assumes the second one is using the Pro Stick?

    I'd be very pleased to see that amount of gain, especially from a free receiver.
    Mike


    www.radarspotting.com

    Radarspotting since 2005

  3. #23
    Passenger dudesjp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    SBCT
    Posts
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by abcd567 View Post
    @dudesjp
    Did you adjust the gain of dump1090? The default "max" is 49.6 dB. Try 45 dB and then 42 dB, most likely it will improve your range.

    If you have dump1090-mutability, use this command to change gain setting.
    Code:
    sudo dpkg-reconfigure dump1090-mutability
    See this page:
    http://flightaware.com/adsb/prostick/setup/

    .
    I Didn't! Yes, I have the Mutability one, I'll try this then! Thank you

    Quote Originally Posted by Anmer View Post
    Looking at your two polar diagrams, it looks like you've gained some useful extra range. That assumes the second one is using the Pro Stick?

    I'd be very pleased to see that amount of gain, especially from a free receiver.
    With this new tip from @abcd567, let's try and see if gets better!
    T-SBCT5/T-SBCT6

  4. #24
    Passenger
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    T-WBGG4, KCH
    Posts
    9
    I started with using the R820T version 1, range about 150-170nm max out, then upgraded to R820T2 which so call version 2, range was increased to 180nm to 210nm. Finally found and bought flightaware pro stick usb from ebay as in Malaysia this is quite
    hard to import in. After i put in the pro stick, wholaaa... the range now is over 250nm, range about 200nm to 280nm, my max range detected is 340nm recorded in the flightaware tracklog so surprised. Currently ranging is over 200nm all the times.
    My raspi was using the original FR24 image file and i also add in flightaware and planefinder client into it. working like charm... Oh ya... i also add in the SMA filter from flightaware too, for me that filter really working great, if take that out, i can see the range drop significantly. So all in and get a prefect range. Enjoying the range..... :O

  5. #25
    Captain abcd567's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Toronto CYYZ
    Posts
    2,882
    @maxxtech
    The FA Antenna+FA Filter+ProStic is the best option I have used up to now.

    I have 2 setups. My stats show the FA combo gives much better performance: Message rate 182%, Plane count 114%

    Pi-1: Cantenna + 12 ft RG6 Coax + 12 inch RG316 pigtail + Black DVB-T (No Amplifier) >> plugged directly into OPi PC
    Pi-2: FA Antenna + 4 ft RG6 Coax + 4 inch RG316 pigtail + FA Filter + ProStick >> plugged directly into RPi Model2

    Note:
    (1) Both antennas are at same location in same vertical line. Horizontal distance = 0, Vertical distance = 1 m / 3 ft
    (2) There is NO AMPLIFIER with Cantenna + Generic DVB-T, while ProStick has a built-in RF amplifier.





  6. #26
    Passenger
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    T-WBGG4, KCH
    Posts
    9
    @abcd567
    Ya... i also using the FA antenna too, your setup is mostly like mine. Only different is the feeding cable i using the LMR240 and length about 8meters from my antenna setup about 70feets from ground which attached to a mast on my roof. Big different between this two setup was the received data is double up of each. There is one time in the FR static i saw there is a log of 374nm of maximum distance which shocked me. So FA antenna + FA pro stick + FA amplify filter was the best option for T- feeder.

  7. #27
    Captain abcd567's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Toronto CYYZ
    Posts
    2,882
    @maxxtech
    Range greater than 300 is shown on FR24, but my local data monitoring on Ras Pi / dump1090 restricts data to 300 nm. See below range figures on graphs generated locally on RPi, and Polar Graphs generated by FR24:

    LOCAL GRAPHS








    FR24 POLAR CURVES



    ================================================== =================





    .

  8. #28
    First officer
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    T-KSJC28
    Posts
    335
    Shouldn't the real test be the difference between the two different DVB-T sticks? The FA antenna has 6dB gain. Would like to see a comparison between a typical ADSB stick with FA antenna and the FA pro stick with filter, and same FA antenna and cables. That would show if it is worth the extra expense and higher power consumption.

    Edit: BTW abcd567, how did you get that range with that antenna setup in the pics? Do you live in a lighthouse?
    Last edited by Sam26K; 2016-07-11 at 06:28.

  9. #29
    Captain Anmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,384
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam26K View Post
    Would like to see a comparison between a typical ADSB stick with FA antenna and the FA pro stick with filter, and same FA antenna and cables.
    I ran a comparative back in April when the Pro Stick was launched and you can see the results here:

    http://radarspotting.com/forum/index....html#msg28838

    Both sharing the same FA antenna using an RF Systems SP3 splitter. To make it an even contest, I used an FA filter with each DVB-T.
    Mike


    www.radarspotting.com

    Radarspotting since 2005

  10. #30
    Captain abcd567's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Toronto CYYZ
    Posts
    2,882
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam26K View Post
    Shouldn't the real test be the difference between the two different DVB-T sticks? The FA antenna has 6dB gain. Would like to see a comparison between a typical ADSB stick with FA antenna and the FA pro stick with filter, and same FA antenna and cables. That would show if it is worth the extra expense and higher power consumption.
    My DVB-T usb dongle (black) is connected to Cantenna, and ProStick+Filter to FA antenna.

    Once I swapped Cantenna & FA antenna, and performance of BOTH systems dropped . I checked all connection, all was ok.

    I think the reason is simple, but not obvious. The DVB-T dongle is designed for TV, and its input impedance (front end tuner chip R820T) has standard TV impedance of 75 ohms. The Cantenna also has an impedance of 70 ohms, so this makes a good impedance match.

    The Pro Stick's also has the tuner chip R820T2 with input impedance of 75 ohms, but it is not the front end. The front end is a RF amplifier chip which has an input impedance of 50 ohms. Also the Filter and FA antenna have 50 ohms impedance. Hence FA antenna+Filter+ProStick make a perfect impedance match.

    By swapping FA antenna with Cantenna, my both system suffered from impedance mismatch 75 combined with 50 ohms, and hence performance of both dropped.


    Edit: BTW abcd567, how did you get that range with that antenna setup in the pics? Do you live in a lighthouse?
    Umm..., yes, equivalent of a lighthouse .

    I live in an apartment in a tall building. My apartment is about 50 feet above the road level, and I have my antennas placed near U shaped tall and wide glass window (i.e. antennas can see about 270 degrees out of 360 degrees). The window is not obvious in photo as only a small part of it was captured by the camera, and that also is hidden behind vertical blinds.

    The window/lighthouse is more obvious in photos in these two posts:

    1) Trial Run Results for Three Types of Whip Antennas


    2) Trial Run Results for Four Sizes of Ground Planes
    Last edited by abcd567; 2016-07-11 at 16:20.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •