New webpage design: Bug reports

[Anmer]

We are on it, Piotr sent a message.

Great, thanks Olov.

[fusionimage]

i can't see the navbar on top of the page. already did strg+f5, deleted cache & cookies, without any change.
the problem is this line:

<nav id="navContainer" class="navbar navbar-inverse navbar-fixed-top premium" role="navigation" style="top:-52px;">

if i change -52 to 0, the navbar is there until i reload the page. maybe the info was stored in the user database, since we could hide/show the navbar with the old design and mine was hidden?

[Oblivian]

i can't see the navbar on top of the page. already did strg+f5, deleted cache & cookies, without any change.
the problem is this line:

<nav id="navContainer" class="navbar navbar-inverse navbar-fixed-top premium" role="navigation" style="top:-52px;">

if i change -52 to 0, the navbar is there until i reload the page. maybe the info was stored in the user database, since we could hide/show the navbar with the old design and mine was hidden?

Oddly, I don't see that. I'ts not what is toggled in fullscreen mode is it? (which leaves the logo only and moves bar up) I can toggle full/not but cant find the CSS its adjusting.

[fusionimage]

i have it on line 1176
when i have edited the value, i can toggle between fullscreen and default (with the navbar), but when i reload the page, switching between default and fullscreen doesn't change anything and the navbar remains hidden

[Olov]

i can't see the navbar on top of the page. already did strg+f5, deleted cache & cookies, without any change.
the problem is this line:

<nav id="navContainer" class="navbar navbar-inverse navbar-fixed-top premium" role="navigation" style="top:-52px;">

if i change -52 to 0, the navbar is there until i reload the page. maybe the info was stored in the user database, since we could hide/show the navbar with the old design and mine was hidden?

Thanks!

I can confirm that it was a bug as reported. It's fixed on our internal beta now and will be "live" at next release. Hopefully today.

[Olov]

As you might have already noticed, global playback is back. Thank you for your patience!

[Anmer]

The "N" Premium issue is fixed, thank you, but there are reports that the "Show Statistics" isn't working for these feeds:

http://radarspotting.com/forum/index.php/topic,5828.msg28824.html#msg28824

[fusionimage]

Thanks!

I can confirm that it was a bug as reported. It's fixed on our internal beta now and will be "live" at next release. Hopefully today.

thanks, it it working now!

[Olov]

The "N" Premium issue is fixed, thank you, but there are reports that the "Show Statistics" isn't working for these feeds:

http://radarspotting.com/forum/index....html#msg28824

Thank you for reporting Mike! Will look at statistics on Monday.

[Anmer]

Not sure if this is a possible bug from the latest release but you're tracking an aircraft that you don't have in your history database. Hex 7803A1.

01.jpg

[mimku]

Just noticed that Easyjet ( UK ) flight-numbers are being prefixed with U2 instead of EZY. This is incorrect, Easyjet use EZY for both callsigns and flight-numbers as any airport departure board will show:

http://www.gatwickairport.com/flights/

They do use U2 internally for ACARS programming but they're not IATA members and so don't expose this code to the public. So using U2 can confuse passengers looking for EZY183, for example, which what it says on their ticket but can't be found on FR24 ( its callsign is EZY39EZ but they can't search for that even if they knew it ).


I don't remember this bug prior to the re-launch, though I don't follow many Easyjet flights...

[equi]

I don't know if this has already been posted, but when you have a flight which is not in the DB you'll see only the time when its departed - but now how long time passed. In the "old" website FR24 displayed it when you hover with the mouse of the time, but now its looking only like this

Unbenannt.png

[rik130]

As you might have already noticed, global playback is back. Thank you for your patience!

Thank you Olov!

However, numerous issues still remain with flight history, particularly where data older than 1 month is not showing despite having a gold membership.

Eg.

https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/a6-rju

Won't connect to server and sits there trying to connect for a seemingly infinite period. The above link previously displayed a flight KBFI-KGED on 22 Dec, then KGED-EDDH overnight 16-17 Feb. Why are these not showing?

https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/n724ac

Where is the flight 5 Feb KBFI-KCWF which showed on the old version?

https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/f-wtbr

Where are the ferry flights 19-21 Feb LFBD-OMDB-RCSS ? Showed on old version.

First flights are still not showing at all. Most recent example :

https://www.flightradar24.com/2016-03-31/20:41/12x//944ae0c

BOE035 out of RNT = EI-FRF. Already added to the database :

https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/ei-frf

So why is the flight on 31 March not showing under that rego? I have said before that you have a bug where if the rego data is added AFTER the event, that event isn't appended to the rego. The flight history function is no good if it only shows flights from the point where the db editors added the rego to the hex. If that is not possible then please let us search by hex code so we can see the actual FULL history, not part there-of.

[ErManu86]

Problems with the pay with Master Card, solve this please... I can't buy a suscription...

[rik130]

Further, flight track tracers are not showing in playback.

https://www.flightradar24.com/2016-03-30/18:51/12x//941a26f

780EFB ping at the top departed KRNT at 1847z but no tracer. Also the icon hit boxes are glitchy where sometimes clicking on the actual icon doesn't do anything, the hit box is often a few cms to the side/above/below the actual icon. Very annoying when there are a lot of icons in one area which now requires zooming in far more than previously in order to avoid selecting the wrong one. The old version was accurate in comparison.