Originally posted by North Borneo Radar
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
1090Mhz Antenna , any better choose ?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by lanzarote View PostI didnīt know that site. I like this one http://www.heywhatsthat.com/
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Anmer View Post850Km is the equivalent of 460 nautical miles.
In normal conditions, the curvature of the earth will restrict the range to approximately 250nm.
Typical range for aircraft at 40,000 feet is 245 nautical miles if the antenna is at sea level or 273nm if the antenna is at 500 feet. This assumes no obstacles to block the aircraft messages. In some favourable weather conditions the range can be greater but it is exceptional to get 460nm.
http://members.home.nl/7seas/radcalc.htm
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by F-VHHH4 View Postand looking for another 850KM Coverage.
In normal conditions, the curvature of the earth will restrict the range to approximately 250nm.
Typical range for aircraft at 40,000 feet is 245 nautical miles if the antenna is at sea level or 273nm if the antenna is at 500 feet. This assumes no obstacles to block the aircraft messages. In some favourable weather conditions the range can be greater but it is exceptional to get 460nm.
Leave a comment:
-
In my island, the receiver at the top of a 614 meters high pick over sea level, no obstacles around, the max coverage has been 610 kilometers 360š. I have tried a 1090 MHz yagi antenna and no way to get better coverage.
Leave a comment:
-
I have installed a box, in one of my installations under the mast, keeping the receiver. You would bring the power and ethernet cable there.
Leave a comment:
-
5 Meters is not possible for now, because the device is colo at house. and the Antenna is installed on the rooftop.
Leave a comment:
-
My experience, if you want to increase coverage is, the shortest possible antenna cable lenght. 5 meters long cable is the best option instead of changing the antenna.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: