Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

RPi MLAT issues??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • RPi MLAT issues??

    Hi, Im just wondering if anyone on here can clarify to me whether on not my MLAT is actually working or not?
    On the log file it says connection success but then seems to disconnect?
    My Log is as follows:

    2016-01-05 12:45:46 | [mlat][i]Configuring UDP connection udp://mlat-1.fr24.com:19788
    2016-01-05 12:45:46 | [mlat][i]Registering MLAT station
    2016-01-05 12:45:46 | [mlat][i]Registering MLAT station: SUCCESS
    2016-01-05 12:45:48 | [feed][i]sent 14 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:45:53 | [feed][i]removed 1 of 18 AC
    2016-01-05 12:45:53 | [feed][i]sent 12 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:45:54 | [mlat][i]Pinging the server
    2016-01-05 12:45:54 | [mlat][i]Stats 0/0
    2016-01-05 12:45:58 | [feed][i]sent 12 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:46:03 | [feed][i]sent 14 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:46:08 | [feed][i]sent 14 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:46:13 | [feed][i]sent 13 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:46:14 | [mlat][i]Pinging the server
    2016-01-05 12:46:14 | [mlat][i]Stats 0/0
    2016-01-05 12:46:18 | [feed][i]sent 13 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:46:21 | [stats][i]sent 3762 bytes
    2016-01-05 12:46:23 | [feed][i]sent 11 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:46:28 | [feed][i]sent 12 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:46:32 | [time][i]Synchronizing time via NTP
    2016-01-05 12:46:33 | [feed][i]sent 12 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:46:34 | [mlat][i]Pinging the server
    2016-01-05 12:46:34 | [mlat][i]Stats 0/0
    2016-01-05 12:46:36 | [time][i]Time synchronized correctly, offset +0.0004 seconds, drift -0.0003 seconds/minute
    2016-01-05 12:46:38 | [feed][i]sent 12 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:46:43 | [feed][i]sent 10 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:46:49 | [feed][i]removed 1 of 19 AC
    2016-01-05 12:46:49 | [feed][i]sent 11 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:46:54 | [feed][i]sent 12 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:46:59 | [feed][i]sent 12 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:47:04 | [feed][i]sent 10 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:47:09 | [feed][i]sent 10 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:47:13 | [feed][i]removed 1 of 18 AC
    2016-01-05 12:47:14 | [feed][i]sent 11 AC in 1 packet
    2016-01-05 12:47:15 | [mlat][i]Pinging the server
    2016-01-05 12:47:15 | [mlat][w]Could not ping MLAT server, result=-1000, number of errors=1
    But when using the SSH terminal it displays:

    [ ok ] FR24 Feeder/Decoder Process: running.
    [ ok ] FR24 Stats Timestamp: 2016-01-05 12:51:44.
    [ ok ] FR24 Link: connected [UDP].
    [ ok ] FR24 Radar: T-EGNJ41.
    [ ok ] FR24 Tracked AC: 17.
    [ ok ] Receiver: connected (189298 MSGS/0 SYNC).
    [ ok ] FR24 MLAT: ok [UDP].
    [ ok ] FR24 MLAT AC seen: 16.
    Anyone have any ideas??
    Regards
    Roy {NEWBIE}

  • #2
    Same problem! - http://forum.flightradar24.com/threa...ll=1#post73882
    T-UKCW1 / T-UKCK1 online since 2014.05.31
    Antenna: 18 Elements Vertical Collinear / Reciver: RTL-SDR (R820T2) + RaspberryPi 2B (MLAT enabled)
    Range / Area: T-UKCW1 - up to 286 nm (530 km) - reception range diagram / T-UKCK1 - up to 229 nm (424 km) - reception range diagram

    Comment


    • #3
      Same problem!
      sorry never saw your post!
      looks like no one found an answer to it then??

      Comment


      • #4
        Noone knows what has been programmed to function 'normal' other than the tested working status output which was possibly not tested on the latest version of debian base. (nor working as expected)

        Support don't tend to check forums, probably best to approach by email
        Posts not to be taken as official support representation - Just a helpful uploader who tinkers

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Oblivian View Post
          Noone knows what has been programmed to function 'normal' other than the tested working status output which was possibly not tested on the latest version of debian base. (nor working as expected)

          Support don't tend to check forums, probably best to approach by email
          I've gathered!! lol
          Thinks it going to have to be a put up and shut up situation, ah well !
          Thanks all!

          Comment

          Working...
          X