Yes, I realise they are talking about their own mlat network, but I don't see how running their mlat client alongside anyone else's would inherently cause problems, either for them or the other networks.
The only potential conflict I can see is if they are getting sent mlat results from other clients because their version of dump1090 is ancient and can't recognise them. For clients using an up to date dump1090 or readsb they'd have to be explicitly configured to forward those results and most people won't have done so.
The only potential conflict I can see is if they are getting sent mlat results from other clients because their version of dump1090 is ancient and can't recognise them. For clients using an up to date dump1090 or readsb they'd have to be explicitly configured to forward those results and most people won't have done so.
Comment