FUTURE FEATURE REQUEST'S - For website

[nbiler]

I know there is a feature to see the 5 most tracked flights, but I think it would be cool if you could see the number of people tracking a flight when you click on it (it could also be in the more info category). Vote below if you would like to see this.

[tanhy]

Feature Request 1:
1x playback speed option in Flightradar24 website

For info, currently the slowest playback speed in Flightradar24 website is 12x. There are times when I like to replay Flightradar24 with ATC recording (from elsewhere) so 1x speed will be good.
Also 1x playback speed is already available but only in Flightradar24 mobile app (at least for Android which I'm using) but just not available in your website.
This will also improve consistency across Flightradar24 offerings.

Slowest playback speed in Flightradar24 website:
FR1A.png

Slowest playback speed in Flightradar24 Android app
FR1B.png


Feature Request 2:
More advance email alert settings and management abilities

Such as...

• Ability to sort/re-sequence alerts. E.g. currently it can only appear as a chronological list. Over time as more alerts are added (such as tracking delivery registrations), it's starting to get quite disorder and difficulty to find.
• Ability to use wildcards perhaps even regular expression. E.g. 4-digit fight numbers starting with 8 for a specific airline (usually the case for special functional check flights, positioning or delivery flights).
• Ability to view & edit alerts. E.g. revisit the local alerts as currently there is no way to see it again once set.
• Improve alert logic. E.g. currently when adding alert for a single aircraft type with multiple airlines option in the same alert, this is not working for reasons unknown and impossible to understand why. Alert only work for a single aircraft type with a single airline option. So have to add multiple of such alert to cover multiple airlines.

Feature Request 3:
Consider adding a sub-folder in the downloadable KML files that extends path to ground

Currently there are route and trial folders showing a flight's actual path. In addition to this, a proposed path extension to ground will allow for better visualisation against ground features (e.g. a flight plan plot) without additional user effort to manipulate the KML data.

Flightradar24 KML file against flight plan plot without path extension to ground:
FR3A.png

Flightradar24 KML file against flight plan plot with path extension to ground:
FR3B.png


Feature "Correction" Request:
Fix the Incorrect day-night map in Data / History pages if system time zone not UTC described in an adjacent forum.


Thank you!

[lameduck]

Dear FR24-team,

some feature requests for filters:
- allow changing the sequence of filters (like managing bookmarks in the older version) and/or
- add a 'sort filters by type' (callsign, airport etc.) feature
- filter features for airports: Allow multiple airport selection in one filter (something like in/out for "ARN, FRA, LHR").

Perhaps an even more challenging request: Add ICAO-designators for airport filters an allow asterisks as wildcards, like filter airport ES* for all Swedish airports.

Thank you very much for considering the ideas.

- lameduck -

[Missing an engine]

Please bring back the option to turn filters on and off the new way is a big step backwards as you have to turn each filter off individual before you can see other planes and then turn them all back on again

Thanks for listening great that its back

[M1k3D3l7a]

I'd like to request a feature that allows us to minimize the A/C we are following, hence generating more space on the screen.
One loses the overview quite quickly, especially when tracking multiple A/C at the same time, see example:
FR24.PNG

[helios]

Hi,
I have noticed that FLARM data is incomplete on FR24. When clicking on an aircraft, the aircraft trail/flight path is often not available, even though data is in high resolution available on the FLARM network.
Would it be possible to improve the FLARM feed? It would be also nice if FLARM and ADS-B data from a single aircraft could be combined. As far as I figured out, it's always either one or the other for aircrafts which transmit both.

Privacy shouldn't be issue, as owners who have enabled PRIV or NOTRACK on their FLARM are invisible on fr24 already.

Thanks

[jmaustin]

More levels of zoom please. Right now, "5" is too small for my purposes and "6" is too big. a 100-point scale would be a huge improvement. Thanks!

[KeithKenobi]

Make the filters selectable as "AND/OR" so when you select multiple filters, you can either see ALL the aircraft matching either filter, or ONLY aircraft matching both filters.
FYI, currently if you select multiple filters of the SAME TYPE (ie icao) then it works like OR, where you see ALL the aircraft from either filter.
If you select multiple filters of DIFFERENT TYPE, (ie icao and registration) the it works like AND so you will see only aircraft matching BOTH filters.
Thanks,

[Fat Blob]

There needs to be an hex filter or at least an unidentified hex filter so that the hex sleuthers can see them all and tie them up for the database. ADSBexchange has a NoReg filter and even Radarbox can do it. I would actually pay a bit more on the sub for this functionality.

[dzr]

Can you please bring back the displaying of the receiving radar-station?

Best regards
DZ

[cmbahadir]

That would be great to see the callsign of the airline when you hover its name. For instance callsign of the "Pegasus" is "Sunturk". This feature would make it easier to track the flight on ATC.

Screenshot_2021-09-23-20-52-11-1.png

[Brian13579]

I'd like to request a geo-fence feature where we could drop a pin on a location or airport, set a radius or polygon, and then get an email alert for any aircraft flying into/out of that geofence. Bonus points for selecting a fir/uir for the geo-fence; obviously this would have to be a relatively small fir/uir.

[TomDLSRQ]

suggestions and input: provide data on the number of passengers on a particular flight.

While I agree that information would be "neat" from the standpoint of the enthusiast user, in the U.S. that information is considered SSI (Security Sensitive Information). I use FR24 as an enthusiast/hobby, as well as being in commercial airline operations, so can attest. I know that seems contrary to practice since it's always broadcast if there's an incident with a flight.... "Boomerang Air Flight 569 with 174 passengers and 9 crew on board..." but that is because the information had been released by the airline, or more commonly now, a passenger aboard the flight shared it socially.

[skonix]

I'd like to request a geo-fence feature where we could drop a pin on a location or airport, set a radius or polygon, and then get an email alert for any aircraft flying into/out of that geofence. Bonus points for selecting a fir/uir for the geo-fence; obviously this would have to be a relatively small fir/uir.

While being similar to Brian13579's request, I would like to have the option to add one of my fleets as "alert type" in the Alerts page. Thank you!

[Fat Blob]

A forum where we could report database errors and changes would be a nice addition.