Aircraft to be added into Flightradar24 aircraft database

[NorskeTroll]

1506AC
RA-67244
CRJ2
Bombardier Challenger 850
8094
private
2009

[NorskeTroll]

020126
CN-TKD
C650
Cessna Citation III
650-0190
Air Ocean Maroc
1990

[NorskeTroll]

346644
EC-NOY
A320
Airbus A320-214
2633
Volotea
VOE
2005-12-01

[NorskeTroll]

5140B3
4L-GTG
B738
35105
Georgian Airways
TGZ
2008-01-18

[MartinMontero03]

E2009C
LV-S086
SIRA
Tecnam P2002 Sierra
Serial number unknown
Aeroclub Tucuman

E200A0
LV-S095
SIRA
Tecnam P2002 Sierra
Serial number unknown
Private Owner

E200F9
LV-X610
RV7
Van's RV-7
Serial number unknown
Correcaminos

E0A44F
LV-JQO
R66
Robinson R-66
Serial Number Unknown
Hangar Uno

[WayneKing]

33FD27
MM55237
M345
Leonardo T-345A
Italian Air Force
2021-00-00

[Fat Blob]

"Should" is different than "must".

However what you complaint with Bahamanbarbarian to repost something you posted before, but he posted full information about that aircraft, you did not. If someone added what you posted, probably the aircraft would be in the database with half information for a long time and requiring editors to back to the aircraft and update it.



However is not needed add an aircraft before its first flight or when the MSN is unknown (especially Boeing and Airbus planes), because this information will be known soon and we have to go back to update the aircraft. There's not a prize to who post more brand new aircraft, so it's better wait until all information about an aircraft are known, at least when the aircraft don't take its first flight.

I know that 737-8200 is the correct name, and I also know that they are Bombardier aircrafts... but this is something that doesn't depends on me. FR24 managment choose that should be called in this way, so we have to accept it.

What on earth are you talking about? All the information was known and correct in my post, along with all the other Ryanairs that I posted. What you really want to say is that you didn't believe the data in my submissions and so chose to ignore it until the planespotters.net database editor bahamabarbarian posted it himself.

No-one cares for the first flight dates. The arguments over this pointless field make for 50% of the posts across these 2 sub-forums yet you continue to persist. Arguing that no planes can be submitted to the database until they have flown is a stupid nonsensical argument. If the frame has been identified and hex tie-up confirmed then it should be entered in the database ASAP so users can see what it is when it flies. The other sub-forum is there to submit amendments and corrections for existing frames.

[Chubaca feroz]

0AC7BC
FAC4138
H60
Sikorsky MH-60L Black Hawk
11-27241
Colombian Air Force

0AC913
FAC4135
H60
Sikorsky MH-60L Black Hawk
n/a
Colombian Air Force

0AC900
FAC0007
H60
Sikorsky UH-60A Black Hawk
89-26175
Colombian Air Force
1989

[AirMe]

According to whom? Please provide a source from FR24 to support your statement.

"Should" is different than "must".

However what you complaint with Bahamanbarbarian to repost something you posted before, but he posted full information about that aircraft, you did not. If someone added what you posted, probably the aircraft would be in the database with half information for a long time and requiring editors to back to the aircraft and update it.

AirMe well that's not actually true is it, many aircraft are posted especially by banana man that havent flown, look here is one I posted https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/f-wsix first flight March 10th but "you" added it before it flew

Also your designation for the Ryanair 737 is wrong, correct is 737-8200, if you look at the TCDS from the FAA or EASA this verifies the facts or is this another made up FR24 aircraft like all the Mitsubishi CRJ?

However is not needed add an aircraft before its first flight or when the MSN is unknown (especially Boeing and Airbus planes), because this information will be known soon and we have to go back to update the aircraft. There's not a prize to who post more brand new aircraft, so it's better wait until all information about an aircraft are known, at least when the aircraft don't take its first flight.

I know that 737-8200 is the correct name, and I also know that they are Bombardier aircrafts... but this is something that doesn't depends on me. FR24 managment choose that should be called in this way, so we have to accept it.

[Xian]

791CAD
30074
AN12
Shaanxi KJ-500
China Air Force

[@eb4ewl]

3A1E44
F-OHSE
AS50
Aerospatiale AS 350B2 Ecureuil
2291
Helilagon
0000-00-00

[JonChristianNU]

LN0310NB:
ICAO Code Hexadecimal: 47C889

Registration: LN-0310-NA
Serial number (MSN): MSN 0449
Operator Code: Nordic Unmanned AS, EASA operator NORsfw7srvn9kcxj
Type: Schiebel Camcopter S-100
Airline/Owner: Nordic Unmanned
First flight date: 2006-00-00

[WayneKing]

Aircrafts should be posted once they took their maiden flight. So bahamabarbarian, thank you for repost it with full information, now it can be added in the database.

AirMe well that's not actually true is it, many aircraft are posted especially by banana man that havent flown, look here is one I posted https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/f-wsix first flight March 10th but "you" added it before it flew

Also your designation for the Ryanair 737 is wrong, correct is 737-8200, if you look at the TCDS from the FAA or EASA this verifies the facts or is this another made up FR24 aircraft like all the Mitsubishi CRJ?

[Xian]

78079C
B-9395
DA40
Diamond DA-40DS Diamond Star
40.DS017
Private
2010-00-00

[bahamabarbarian]

A43EAB
N3728B
C207
Cessna T207 Turbo Stationair 7
20700298
Allman Air
1975-00-00

A4A678
N399ZA
L39
Aero L-39ZA Albatros
332641
Coastal Defense
1983-00-00

A4AD13
N400EP
E50P
Embraer Phenom 100
50000340
Private owner
0000-00-00