Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Aircraft to be added into Flightradar24 aircraft database

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by nomad77 View Post
    39CDC5
    F-HPOP
    G2CA
    Cabri G2
    1165
    Private
    2016-00-00
    I have this as F-HTOF AS350 AS 350 B3 Squirell C/n 8104

    which one is correct?
    Thank you

    Comment


    • 39DCD5 converts to F-HTOF

      39BDCF converts to F-HPOP

      Neither are in the DB

      Comment


      • Originally posted by apgphoto View Post
        Question for the DB guys...

        Italian AF M346 are now appearing out of their base with their correct hex codes (mainly!) do you want them added with full details or just the hex codes so you can block them? They dont use "AMI" callsigns so wont be auto blocked.
        Full details would be fine :-)

        Comment


        • 3452C1
          EC-MME
          BE20
          Beech B200 Super King Air
          BB-1607
          Grup Air-Med, S.A
          GPM
          1998

          Comment


          • E49273
            FAB6550
            C295
            CASA SC-105 Persuader
            157
            Brazilian Air Force
            Last edited by Edilson.Carlos; 2017-06-30, 13:00.

            Comment


            • A2B919
              N275AK
              B739
              Boeing 737-990ER
              61556
              Alaska Airlines
              ASA
              2017-07-00

              Comment


              • 4D216A
                9H-GPS
                C56X
                Cessna 560XL Citation Excel
                560-5249
                Luxwing
                LWG
                2002

                Comment


                • DB guys can you at least look at the existing data for dual identity hexcodes before changing them to one aircraft out of the two, this is the second time you have changed a dual hex to one aircraft when both are still using it.

                  On 28/06 hex 3006A0 was correctly in the DB as both P28T I-PITU and HDJT I-JACK today/yesterday its been changed to just I-JACK and I-PITU is no long in the DB and the historic flight data no longer shows up.

                  I-PITU has been using this code since at least Sept 2016 and I-JACK has adopted this code since delivery early this month. One of them is wrong and ENAC and Eurocontrol know about it, so hopefully it will get sorted.

                  Screens from 28/06 showing both aircraft still active. Yes i know this should be in data errors but at least I know Maxi reads what we write here.

                  Capture.jpgCapture-1.JPG

                  Comment


                  • I'm sure I've seen on some entries extra info saying that it's a miscode or shared with aircraft x. I don't know why this isn't used more. It would certainly help for most of the South American ones which are using old codes. You could append the most used or most likely to be seen reg as the primary one, then also mark on the box that it's also shared with x.

                    Similarly, the manufacturer test regos should receive the same treatment and say underneath them that it is a manufacturer test code.

                    Comment


                    • 407283
                      G-CJUL
                      B789
                      Boeing 787-9
                      38779
                      DI/NRS + DY/NAX
                      Norwegian Air UK (airline) + Norwegian (operator)
                      2017-06-14

                      Tail art person thingy is Roald Dahl - British Storyteller, if you care.

                      G-CIXO, G-CJGI, G-CJUI and G-NRWY should all receive the same airline/oprerator treatment as above too. Currently they all show just under Norwegian.

                      Comment


                      • 7811D6
                        B-1480
                        B738
                        Boeing 737-86W
                        60167
                        Fuzhou Airlines
                        FZA
                        2017-06-30

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Tyke's Aero blog View Post
                          I'm sure I've seen on some entries extra info saying that it's a miscode or shared with aircraft x. I don't know why this isn't used more. It would certainly help for most of the South American ones which are using old codes. You could append the most used or most likely to be seen reg as the primary one, then also mark on the box that it's also shared with x.

                          Similarly, the manufacturer test regos should receive the same treatment and say underneath them that it is a manufacturer test code.
                          That's exactly how 3006A0 was displayed as two aircraft.

                          Below is an example 3003D7 used by a P180 correctly and a C208 incorrectly but at least it shows both aircraft

                          Capture.jpg

                          Comment


                          • Nice ^. I see it's a bit of a fudge in the 'airline' field then. Given the large amount of miscodes and other oddities, it would be a useful feature for Mike to add a 'notes' box so that useful info like that can be displayed. I doubt it will ever happen though given previous history here.

                            Comment


                            • And who ever did the amendment to 3006A0 where did you get the mickey mouse information from?

                              The MSN is not for the HDJT or the P28U the first flight date is when it was delivered

                              WTF do we bother to help you guys

                              Capture.JPG

                              Comment


                              • On this forum, I suspect...
                                Don't know the ICAO type code? Look it up here.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X