Aircraft to be added into Flightradar24 aircraft database

[nomad77]

TBM.jpg

Its a TBM8 and TBM-850

Really!

[nomad77]

7C2B17
VH-ISP
S92
Sikorsky S-92A
920161
HNZ Australia
2012-00-00

[apgphoto]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8764[/ATTACH]

Really!

Yes really DGAC like the FAA use the type certificate information not the ICAO type or manufacturer type.

TBM8 MSN's are in the range 346-687 TBM9 is 1000 ->

Click the link for a pretty picture it even says TBM-850 on the tail https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8535681

Case closed as you would say

[nomad77]

Yes really DGAC like the FAA use the type certificate information not the ICAO type or manufacturer type.

TBM8 MSN's are in the range 346-687 TBM9 is 1000 ->

Click the link for a pretty picture it even says TBM-850 on the tail https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8535681

Case closed as you would say

All Australian TBM700 are listed by CASA as TBM7 as well as the above. I remember a thread about this sometime back, what exactly happened
to create this situation. It's a bit of a worry when you have to look at a picture to see what an aircraft is, clearly someone changed the rules.

I don't claim to know everything and appreciate people correcting that information that is wrong but it helps when they add something to explain
like a link to the information used.

This is especially the case when the information differs from an offical site where you would think the information would be correct.

Chrs

BTW my "Case closed ?" was a question not a statement

[nomad77]

399120
F-HEJA
DA40
Diamond DA 40 NG
40.N329
A.T.A. Distribution

[apgphoto]

This is just one example from hundreds of N additions that have been posted in this and the other thread only to be completely ignored. I get that there is clearly a back-end algorithm running to auto decode the hex codes but all that does is show the expected reg for a given hex. It doesn't confirm that the frame is using it and nor does it add details about the frame itself such as the type, owner/operator, msn etc etc.

And that would be so easy to do as so many other database providers prove. It would simply be a case of downloading the USA registry for FREE and then importing it in to the FR24 database. An automated process that would save everyone time.

Too easy?

[airbum]

45CACB
OY-RVK
RV8
Vans RV-8
80033
Private
2016-12-21

[apgphoto]

All Australian TBM700 are listed by CASA as TBM7 as well as the above. I remember a thread about this sometime back, what exactly happened
to create this situation. It's a bit of a worry when you have to look at a picture to see what an aircraft is, clearly someone changed the rules.

I don't claim to know everything and appreciate people correcting that information that is wrong but it helps when they add something to explain
like a link to the information used.

This is especially the case when the information differs from an offical site where you would think the information would be correct.

Chrs

BTW my "Case closed ?" was a question not a statement

FAA, DGAC and CASA (and others) are taking the information from the TCDS.

The problem with the TBM is that the 850 and 9xx are variants of the 700.

In TCDS talk the 700A/B/C is a 700 and the 850 and 9xx are 700N but they are all variants of the 700 so the FAA, DGAC and CASA (probably others too) register them as TBM700 at least the UK CAA register the 850 and 9xx as TBM700N.

The 850 and 9xx dont exist as new aircraft they are just trade names for improved versions of the 700, so the relevant authorities use the overall TCDS for the TBM700.

Even if they used the variant and registered them under TBM700N you would still have TBM-850, 900, 930 and now 910 to choose from

I did correct all the FR24 errors with the TBM-900 and 930 in the data error thread in May, no idea if they have been applied.

If you want to look at the EASA TCDS https://www.easa.europa.eu/system/fi...-%20SOCATA.pdf

In case you are wondering the Airbus single aisle TCDS is for every A318/9/20/21 produced. The different types are listed as individual models so they exist as real aircraft and not variants that's why they are registered as you would expect and not just as A320 for example.

Clear as mud and I spend way too much time working with TCDS

[Edilson.Carlos]

001260
PR-ZDI
RV10
Vans RV-10
41312

[Tyke's Aero blog]

505C6A
OM-ACJ
B744
Boeing 747-433 BDSF
25075
Air Cargo Global
CCC
1991-07-24

ex TC-ACJ.

[Flashie]

Hi I have two balloons with which I own and fly (mostly with transponder on) and which I would like to have added :

485346
PH-AAA
BALL (HAFB)
Cameron Z-140
11974
Flash Ballooning / Flash Ballonvaarten

2016-04-07


and :

485406
PH-ABC
BALL (HAFB)
Cameron N-90
4811
Flash Ballooning / Flash Ballonvaarten

2016-09-22


Is this information okay for you ?

Do you need pictures, and if so, how can I best supply these ?

Yours, Coen

[Edilson.Carlos]

Please add more informations about this aircraft

A662E8
N510RB
E550
Embraer EMB-550 Legacy 500
55000066

[apgphoto]

Do you need pictures, and if so, how can I best supply these ?

Yours, Coen

Coen photos are shown via https://www.jetphotos.com/ so you would need to upload them there.

Grtz

Paul (also a HAB pilot)

[Edilson.Carlos]

add more informations about this aircraft

E4893F
PP-OSL
C208
Cessna C208 Grand Caravan
208B2280

[apgphoto]

4A09AC
YR-BML
B738
Boeing 737-82R(W)
40697
Blue Air
BMS
2010-07-09

Somebody has guessed this is a 734 but that's the only detail in the DB, if you haven't got the full details then dont guess