Aircraft to be added into Flightradar24 aircraft database

[AirMe]

Method Not maintained by forum members.

Welcome to the new way.

This is not the new way, this method has always existed. Now, the forum still aviable for new submission, no change. It's up to users choose what metods they prefer.

[Oblivian]

Existed yes. Been less responsive but the only way outside of volunteers that have had enough? You betcha!

Until the forum gets made read only.

I'm pretty sure you're now the minority and it's on the horizon.

[user12345]

There are aircraft that I added to this symbol + but it still hasn't gone up in the DB.
I tryed 2 times the same aircraft.

What are the details of the ones you have submitted? The admininstrator for the form submissions has assured us that submissions are being processed the same day and added to the database. Please provide a list of your form submissions with dates when you sent them for adding and I will investigate.

[vinicius325]

What are the details of the ones you have submitted? The admininstrator for the form submissions has assured us that submissions are being processed the same day and added to the database. Please provide a list of your form submissions with dates when you sent them for adding and I will investigate.

I tried 2 times this along last week:

E49000
PT-OUF
BE9L
Beech E90 King Air
1981-01-01
GMT7 AIR TÁXI AÉREO

[user12345]

I tried 2 times this along last week:

E49000
PT-OUF
BE9L
Beech E90 King Air
1981-01-01
GMT7 AIR TÁXI AÉREO

Can you provide proof from the Brazil authority that this is the correct hex allocation for PT-OUF ? There is already a marker in the database showing that this hex is "miscoded transponders" which is quite clear to see from the flight ID history over the past 12 months : PTOUF PTLKP PTOIT PRGCP. The latter 2 have since been recoded but both PTLKP and PTOUF are using E49000 so it seems clear to me this is a generic hex used by operators who do not want to pay the authority for an official hex allocation. This is why your submission is not being accepted.

It's worth noting that database editor Arion already does an excellent job of maintaining the Brazil hex records and dealing with the endless miscodes so if you see something without any frame details or notes there is probably a good reason for it, as seen with your example above.

[F-BOYK]

Please enter this aircraft into the database :

383B0A
F-BOYK
WA41
Wassmer 41
152
Private owner
1968-03-01

Best regards,
Laurent

[Aviomar]

3500BD
I-AMDK
C152
Cessna 152
Aviomar Flight Academy
0000-00-00

3D0DD4
I-AMDJ
C152
Cessna 152
Aviomar Flight Academy
0000-00-00

3005CE
I-SPAO
C72R
Cessna 172RG
Aviomar Flight Academy
0000-00-00

[user12345]

3500BD
I-AMDK
C152
Cessna 152
Aviomar Flight Academy
0000-00-00

3D0DD4
I-AMDJ
C152
Cessna 152
Aviomar Flight Academy
0000-00-00

3005CE
I-SPAO
C72R
Cessna 172RG
Aviomar Flight Academy
0000-00-00

Miscodes and nonsense.

[user12345]

duplicate

• Please enter a message with at least 10 characters

[Aviomar]

Miscodes and nonsense.

Hello Can you let us to know what is wrong with the codes ?

Thank you

[user12345]

Hello Can you let us to know what is wrong with the codes ?

Thank you

They are 2 miscodes and 1 wrong.

[Bobey]

48B421
SP-NBB
DA40
Diamond DA40 NG
S/N 5656
Private
Year 2023

[Marko]

51202A
Z3-BGV
AT8T
Air Tractor AT-802A Fire Boss
802A-0329
North Macedonia - Protection & Rescue Directorate
2009

[arion]

Hello Can you let us to know what is wrong with the codes ?

Thank you

3500BD allocated to Spain
3D0DD4 allocated to Germany
3005CE in use by more than 1 aircraft


300000 to 33FFFF Italy

[Marko]

512030
Z3-DAM
P68
Partenavia P.68B
193
Private
1981