Originally posted by @eb4ewl
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Aircraft to be added into Flightradar24 aircraft database
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
I am a student at OXF, unfortunately do not have access to that kind of information yet as I am in the ground training process. I will try to let management aware of that but I doubt they are interested in correcting this.Originally posted by DB Editor View Post
One or the other of you is using the wrong hex. Can I suggest you check your paperwork from the Saudi CAA. If your paperwork shows 717CE2 then contact the CAA about the conflict from HZ-AL58 with Aramco. FYI there is the same issue with 717CE3 HZ-XF38 and HZ-AL59. The Aramco helis were using the hex codes first, so that suggests that your DA40s are miscoded.
Just a quick look at XF37 (HZ-AL58) https://www. flightradar24 .com/data/aircraft/hz-al58#2ede1884, this is still linked to XF37, the activity of the airplane does not represent helicopter activity at all
On the other hand, HZ-AL59 https://www. flightradar24 .com/data/aircraft/hz-al59#2ed1395b looks really like helicopter activity (we do not do this, we are not to operate over water, but Aramco has over water pipe locations and water operations). Also, the helicopter is not linked to HZ-XF38, correct? I do not see call sign any where in HZ-AL59's page.
I do not know if anything can be done to fix this I just wanted to point it out. Anyways, thanks for you efforts DB Editor.
Comment
-
There is plenty of evidence in the logs that 717CE3 is being used by both heli HZ-AL59 and HZ-XF38 from Damman, too. Oxford needs to check their transponders and recode them. If you can speak to the technicians they will be able to check. Management probably not interested in the technicalities and what shows on flight tracking sites.Originally posted by ammar View Post
I am a student at OXF, unfortunately do not have access to that kind of information yet as I am in the ground training process. I will try to let management aware of that but I doubt they are interested in correcting this.
Just a quick look at XF37 (HZ-AL58) https://www. flightradar24 .com/data/aircraft/hz-al58#2ede1884, this is still linked to XF37, the activity of the airplane does not represent helicopter activity at all
On the other hand, HZ-AL59 https://www. flightradar24 .com/data/aircraft/hz-al59#2ed1395b looks really like helicopter activity (we do not do this, we are not to operate over water, but Aramco has over water pipe locations and water operations). Also, the helicopter is not linked to HZ-XF38, correct? I do not see call sign any where in HZ-AL59's page.
I do not know if anything can be done to fix this I just wanted to point it out. Anyways, thanks for you efforts DB Editor.Editor
Comment
-
(browser font? It's an L not T - https://www.flyellow.de/home)Posts not to be taken as official support representation - Just a helpful uploader who tinkers
Comment
-
That's because it's still using the manufacturer hex illegally. 3DD735 is assigned to D-HBTD with Airbus Helicopters Deutschland, Donauwörth. D-HJLA hex assignment is 3DEB82.Originally posted by as356 View PostThis helicopter is incorrectly visible with its old Airbus test registration since yesterday:
3DD735
D-HJLA
EC45
H145 (BK117 D-3)
21021
Johanniter Luftrettung
/
/
2021-06-00Editor
Comment
Comment