Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Aircraft to be added into Flightradar24 aircraft database

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AB5E92
    N8311F
    BE23
    Beech B23 Musketeer
    M1280
    Private owner
    1969-00-00


    AC0832
    N87443
    C310
    Cessna T310R
    310R0562
    Private owner
    1976-00-00
    Aircraft and owner registration information for tail number and call sign N87443, a 1976 CESSNA T310R owned by KEYSTONE AERIAL SURVEYS INC.

    Comment


    • AB9A1D
      N847CS
      RV10
      Van's RV-10
      40325
      Private owner
      2019-00-00
      Aircraft and owner registration information for tail number and call sign N847CS, a 2019 WENTZ SCOTT M VANS ACFT INC RV-10 owned by WENTZ SCOTT M.

      Comment


      • New aircraft to be added

        D-MKCT
        Flight Design CT2K
        Serial 03-07-05-36
        hex 3FFA1D
        private owner

        Comment


        • New aircraft to be added

          Hex: 44051B
          Callsign: OE-DGO
          Owner: USFC Punitz
          Serial: F17202233
          Type: Cessna 172P

          Comment


          • New aircraft to be added

            Callsign: HB-WEE
            Aircraft: Lightwing AC-4 CS-LSA
            Type Code: AC4
            Aircraft-SN: 006
            Building year: 2021
            Airline: Private owner
            Mode S HEX-Code: 4B3A84

            Comment


            • 45F0AA
              OY-9597
              AP22
              Aeroprakt A22LS
              437
              Private Owner
              -
              -
              2022-03-26

              Comment


              • please add my aircraft:

                385A1D
                F-JBUC
                NG5
                Bristell XL8 UL
                Private owner
                2017-04-12

                thk you

                Last edited by FJBUC; 2022-04-19, 12:32.

                Comment


                • 8014BB
                  VT-IMH
                  A21N
                  Airbus A321-251NX
                  10759
                  IndiGo
                  IGO
                  IGO
                  2022-03-22

                  Comment


                  • ModeS - 45B9E1
                    OY-NOA
                    Balloon
                    Kubicek BB22
                    189
                    Private owner

                    Comment


                    • 4B2964
                      HB-PRO
                      P46T
                      Piper PA-46-500TP
                      4697463
                      Private owner
                      ex ZS-IMJ
                      Last edited by rb@aeroformation.ch; 2022-04-08, 20:04.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Vroom View Post
                        4521AB
                        FLYMO1
                        Paramotor
                        msn - n/a
                        Private owner
                        multi coloured
                        First flight date unknown
                        https://www.flickr.com/photos/a-bexx/48838275647/
                        Is it possible to have an update on progress with this please? Many thanks.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Vroom View Post

                          Correct. It is used on a paramotor which does not require a registration (same as wheeled single seat craft below 70kg empty weight). The CAA allocate us a hex code to our personal selves instead. I can forward a copy of the hex allocation to me from NISC if required. We assign ourselves a callsign as a means of identification and the CAA have been happy with this for years. When I say happy… I asked them directly and they said it isn’t causing an issue and they’d rather not have to go through legislation for such a small group due to unwanted costs at this time. They were happy enough that the current info in CAP509 was enough as that is what I use on the radio.
                          This will need referring to the site owner & management for discussion and a decision, which will likely take some time.

                          My own personal opinion is that they should not be allowed simply for the reason that the hex codes are issued to an individual to basically do what they want with them. Without a fixed frame or registration there is no way of indexing them and I'm reasonably confident that the management will not allow personalised callsigns such as "FLYMO" to be used as a registration index. In addition to this, even if they were allowed, the coverage under 1000ft AGL away from the major airports is typically poor, rendering any live or historical flight track data worthless as it'll just be a mess of jagged lines.

                          Please standby for a response from management.
                          Last edited by user12345; 2022-04-05, 09:57.
                          Editor

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by DB Editor View Post

                            This will need referring to the site owner & management for discussion and a decision, which will likely take some time.

                            My own personal opinion is that they should not be allowed simply for the reason that the hex codes are issued to an individual to basically do what they want with them. Without a fixed frame or registration there is no way of indexing them and I'm reasonably confident that the management will not allow personalised callsigns such as "FLYMO" to be used as a registration index. In addition to this, even if they were allowed, the coverage under 1000ft AGL away from the major airports is typically poor, rendering any live or historical flight track data worthless as it'll just be a mess of jagged lines.

                            Please standby for a response from management.
                            Thanks for the reply. Please bear in mind that there is no obligation for us to stay below 1000’ AGL and that we are free to use the Open FIR as we choose. In fact I would estimate half of the time paramotors are used it is above that height and fully capable of being received. I also occasionally make ATZ and MATZ crossings in the UK and have also operated in ICAO Class D (with approval) so it would be a shame if the FlightRadar database decided to choose to be incomplete when the traffic still exists. This is a rapidly growing area adopting electronic conspicuity legitimately which would be completely missed!

                            Comment


                            • 8849B3
                              HS - RMS
                              SR22T
                              CIRRUS
                              2015
                              PRIVATE
                              2022-04-02

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Vroom View Post
                                Thanks for the reply.
                                Please refer to https://forum.flightradar24.com/foru...813#post212813 and continue discussion there if required.
                                Editor

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X