Aircraft to be added into Flightradar24 aircraft database

[bahamabarbarian]

AB9A1D
N847CS
RV10
Van's RV-10
40325
Private owner
2019-00-00

https://aircraft-data.com/N847CS

[zx900ee]

New aircraft to be added

D-MKCT
Flight Design CT2K
Serial 03-07-05-36
hex 3FFA1D
private owner

[firefoxstar]

New aircraft to be added

Hex: 44051B
Callsign: OE-DGO
Owner: USFC Punitz
Serial: F17202233
Type: Cessna 172P

[adriand]

New aircraft to be added

Callsign: HB-WEE
Aircraft: Lightwing AC-4 CS-LSA
Type Code: AC4
Aircraft-SN: 006
Building year: 2021
Airline: Private owner
Mode S HEX-Code: 4B3A84

[janh]

45F0AA
OY-9597
AP22
Aeroprakt A22LS
437
Private Owner
-
-
2022-03-26

[FJBUC]

please add my aircraft:

385A1D
F-JBUC
NG5
Bristell XL8 UL
Private owner
2017-04-12

thk you

https://www.flickr.com/photos/195444563@N03/shares/E6Pin2

[ravi1925]

8014BB
VT-IMH
A21N
Airbus A321-251NX
10759
IndiGo
IGO
IGO
2022-03-22

[jan@internetus.dk]

ModeS - 45B9E1
OY-NOA
Balloon
Kubicek BB22
189
Private owner

[rb@aeroformation.ch]

4B2964
HB-PRO
P46T
Piper PA-46-500TP
4697463
Private owner
ex ZS-IMJ

[Vroom]

4521AB
FLYMO1
Paramotor
msn - n/a
Private owner
multi coloured
First flight date unknown
https://www.flickr.com/photos/a-bexx/48838275647/

Is it possible to have an update on progress with this please? Many thanks.

[user12345]

Correct. It is used on a paramotor which does not require a registration (same as wheeled single seat craft below 70kg empty weight). The CAA allocate us a hex code to our personal selves instead. I can forward a copy of the hex allocation to me from NISC if required. We assign ourselves a callsign as a means of identification and the CAA have been happy with this for years. When I say happy… I asked them directly and they said it isn’t causing an issue and they’d rather not have to go through legislation for such a small group due to unwanted costs at this time. They were happy enough that the current info in CAP509 was enough as that is what I use on the radio.

This will need referring to the site owner & management for discussion and a decision, which will likely take some time.

My own personal opinion is that they should not be allowed simply for the reason that the hex codes are issued to an individual to basically do what they want with them. Without a fixed frame or registration there is no way of indexing them and I'm reasonably confident that the management will not allow personalised callsigns such as "FLYMO" to be used as a registration index. In addition to this, even if they were allowed, the coverage under 1000ft AGL away from the major airports is typically poor, rendering any live or historical flight track data worthless as it'll just be a mess of jagged lines.

Please standby for a response from management.

[Vroom]

This will need referring to the site owner & management for discussion and a decision, which will likely take some time.

My own personal opinion is that they should not be allowed simply for the reason that the hex codes are issued to an individual to basically do what they want with them. Without a fixed frame or registration there is no way of indexing them and I'm reasonably confident that the management will not allow personalised callsigns such as "FLYMO" to be used as a registration index. In addition to this, even if they were allowed, the coverage under 1000ft AGL away from the major airports is typically poor, rendering any live or historical flight track data worthless as it'll just be a mess of jagged lines.

Please standby for a response from management.

Thanks for the reply. Please bear in mind that there is no obligation for us to stay below 1000’ AGL and that we are free to use the Open FIR as we choose. In fact I would estimate half of the time paramotors are used it is above that height and fully capable of being received. I also occasionally make ATZ and MATZ crossings in the UK and have also operated in ICAO Class D (with approval) so it would be a shame if the FlightRadar database decided to choose to be incomplete when the traffic still exists. This is a rapidly growing area adopting electronic conspicuity legitimately which would be completely missed!

[thawatchai]

8849B3
HS - RMS
SR22T
CIRRUS
2015
PRIVATE
2022-04-02

[user12345]

Thanks for the reply.

Please refer to https://forum.flightradar24.com/foru...813#post212813 and continue discussion there if required.

[leoandrew88]

Please update the operator:

A2C7FF
N279AV
Airbus A330-243
1279
Avianca
AVA =New Operator
6 Dec 2011