Originally posted by bahamabarbarian
View Post
-
Already posted nearly a month ago.
-
Aircrafts should be posted once they took their maiden flight. So bahamabarbarian, thank you for repost it with full information, now it can be added in the database.Originally posted by Fat Blob View PostComment
-
According to whom? Please provide a source from FR24 to support your statement.Originally posted by AirMe View PostComment
-
-
-
A34BE2
N311PW
AC50
Aero Commander 500-A
500A-1106-54
Private owner
1961-00-00
A373FC
N321WA
GL5T
Bombardier Global 5000
9852
Winchester Air
2018-00-00
A37D30
N324AD
F900
Dassault Falcon 900
67
Alpha Delta Aviation
1988-00-00
A3947A
N33LK
H25B
Beechcraft Hawker 750
HB-23
Private owner
2008-00-00
A3BBCB
N34JP
BE33
Beech F33C Bonanza
CJ-28
Dakota Aircraft
1970-00-00
A3C280
N341RD
GAZL
Eurocopter SA-341F2 Gazelle
1501
Central Mass Helicopter
1976-00-00Comment
-
A43EAB
N3728B
C207
Cessna T207 Turbo Stationair 7
20700298
Allman Air
1975-00-00
A4A678
N399ZA
L39
Aero L-39ZA Albatros
332641
Coastal Defense
1983-00-00
A4AD13
N400EP
E50P
Embraer Phenom 100
50000340
Private owner
0000-00-00Comment
-
78079C
B-9395
DA40
Diamond DA-40DS Diamond Star
40.DS017
Private
2010-00-00Comment
-
AirMe well that's not actually true is it, many aircraft are posted especially by banana man that havent flown, look here is one I posted https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/f-wsix first flight March 10th but "you" added it before it flewOriginally posted by AirMe View Post
Also your designation for the Ryanair 737 is wrong, correct is 737-8200, if you look at the TCDS from the FAA or EASA this verifies the facts or is this another made up FR24 aircraft like all the Mitsubishi CRJ?
Comment
-
LN0310NB:
ICAO Code Hexadecimal: 47C889
Registration: LN-0310-NA
Serial number (MSN): MSN 0449
Operator Code: Nordic Unmanned AS, EASA operator NORsfw7srvn9kcxj
Type: Schiebel Camcopter S-100
Airline/Owner: Nordic Unmanned
First flight date: 2006-00-00Comment
-
3A1E44
F-OHSE
AS50
Aerospatiale AS 350B2 Ecureuil
2291
Helilagon
0000-00-00Last edited by @eb4ewl; 2021-04-13, 11:34.Comment
-
791CAD
30074
AN12
Shaanxi KJ-500
China Air ForceComment
-
"Should" is different than "must".Originally posted by Fat Blob View Post
However what you complaint with Bahamanbarbarian to repost something you posted before, but he posted full information about that aircraft, you did not. If someone added what you posted, probably the aircraft would be in the database with half information for a long time and requiring editors to back to the aircraft and update it.
However is not needed add an aircraft before its first flight or when the MSN is unknown (especially Boeing and Airbus planes), because this information will be known soon and we have to go back to update the aircraft. There's not a prize to who post more brand new aircraft, so it's better wait until all information about an aircraft are known, at least when the aircraft don't take its first flight.Originally posted by WayneKing View Post
AirMe well that's not actually true is it, many aircraft are posted especially by banana man that havent flown, look here is one I posted https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/f-wsix first flight March 10th but "you" added it before it flew
Also your designation for the Ryanair 737 is wrong, correct is 737-8200, if you look at the TCDS from the FAA or EASA this verifies the facts or is this another made up FR24 aircraft like all the Mitsubishi CRJ?
I know that 737-8200 is the correct name, and I also know that they are Bombardier aircrafts... but this is something that doesn't depends on me. FR24 managment choose that should be called in this way, so we have to accept it.
Comment
-
0AC7BC
FAC4138
H60
Sikorsky MH-60L Black Hawk
11-27241
Colombian Air Force
0AC913
FAC4135
H60
Sikorsky MH-60L Black Hawk
n/a
Colombian Air Force
0AC900
FAC0007
H60
Sikorsky UH-60A Black Hawk
89-26175
Colombian Air Force
1989Comment
-
What on earth are you talking about? All the information was known and correct in my post, along with all the other Ryanairs that I posted. What you really want to say is that you didn't believe the data in my submissions and so chose to ignore it until the planespotters.net database editor bahamabarbarian posted it himself.Originally posted by AirMe View Post
"Should" is different than "must".
However what you complaint with Bahamanbarbarian to repost something you posted before, but he posted full information about that aircraft, you did not. If someone added what you posted, probably the aircraft would be in the database with half information for a long time and requiring editors to back to the aircraft and update it.
However is not needed add an aircraft before its first flight or when the MSN is unknown (especially Boeing and Airbus planes), because this information will be known soon and we have to go back to update the aircraft. There's not a prize to who post more brand new aircraft, so it's better wait until all information about an aircraft are known, at least when the aircraft don't take its first flight.
I know that 737-8200 is the correct name, and I also know that they are Bombardier aircrafts... but this is something that doesn't depends on me. FR24 managment choose that should be called in this way, so we have to accept it.
No-one cares for the first flight dates. The arguments over this pointless field make for 50% of the posts across these 2 sub-forums yet you continue to persist. Arguing that no planes can be submitted to the database until they have flown is a stupid nonsensical argument. If the frame has been identified and hex tie-up confirmed then it should be entered in the database ASAP so users can see what it is when it flies. The other sub-forum is there to submit amendments and corrections for existing frames.Comment
Comment