Data errors in Flightradar24 aircraft database

[WayneKing]

33FECA
P66T
Piaggio P-166DP-1
496
Guardia di Finanza

33FE9B
Guardia di Finanza

[WayneKing]

Noted, I will ask the engineer to check and re program.
But , why did ATC not complain to the crew if the plane identified different Registration?

ATC will see callsign in this case "PKYSF" and the squawk code as the only means of identification from the transponder, rest of the information is from the flight plan. So ATC will know its you even if the transponder is coded incorrectly. There are thousands of miscoded aircraft flying without a problem, it needs the relevant authorities to police them.

[Omarz]

Please correct the next information. The planes and helicopters of the Colombia Police have a separation with (-) in the registration.
Example PNC-0925

The Colombian Police registration has a separation with (-) but the Colombian air force does not have a separation with (-)
Examples
PNC-0747
FAC5732

Please correct because include separation in the Colombian air force and that registration does not have separation (-)
Thanks

[WayneKing]

4B4445
ICAO B505 wtf is H1T
MSN 65299
Year 2020-00-00

[AP Eng]

ATC will see callsign in this case "PKYSF" and the squawk code as the only means of identification from the transponder, rest of the information is from the flight plan. So ATC will know its you even if the transponder is coded incorrectly. There are thousands of miscoded aircraft flying without a problem, it needs the relevant authorities to police them.

Very good explanation, thank you....

[AirMe]

The Colombian Police registration has a separation with (-) but the Colombian air force does not have a separation with (-)
Examples
PNC-0747
FAC5732

Please correct because include separation in the Colombian air force and that registration does not have separation (-)
Thanks

FAC registration don’t have the dash (neither the PNC ones) but letters and numbers are separate. So the dash marks the separation.

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9832792

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9820291

There are also some PNC aircrafts without space or dash:
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8668505

[Omarz]

FAC registration don’t have the dash (neither the PNC ones) but letters and numbers are separate. So the dash marks the separation.

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9832792

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9820291

There are also some PNC aircrafts without space or dash:
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8668505

In some cases they have separation due to errors when registering the registration in jetphotos.com

[AirMe]

In some cases they have separation due to errors when registering the registration in jetphotos.com

Please, look at the pictures (the registration in the aircraft) not their description. Both PNC and FAC have separation, the second one are also written in two different rows and only the last aircraft have no space.
So dash is like a separation.

[Omarz]

Please, look at the pictures (the registration in the aircraft) not their description. Both PNC and FAC have separation, the second one are also written in two different rows and only the last aircraft have no space.
So dash is like a separation.

Yes, I understand that, the registration in the images have separation, but if you put separation in FR but in JP it has no separation, no thumbnail appears in FR, and the idea is that a thumbnail photo appears in the application

[Broome]

7C4411
VH-NQB
PC12
Aviair Pty Ltd

7C4417
VH-NQH
PC12
Aviair Pty Ltd

7C4412
VH-NQC
C208
Aviair Pty Ltd

7C4413
VH-NQD
C208
Aviair Pty Ltd

7C447E
VH-NTC
C208
Aviair Pty Ltd

7C4222
VH-NCK
C208
Aviair Pty Ltd

7C60FB
VH-TFX
C208
Aviair Pty Ltd

7C6284
VH-TQU
C208
Aviair Pty Ltd

7C3F54
VH-MSM
BE20
Aviair Pty Ltd

[vlTepes]

155C22
RA-89122
SU95
Sukhoi Superjet 100-95LR
95177
Red Wings
WZ/ RWZ
WZ/ RWZ
2018-11-29

[Omarz]

Yes, I understand that, the registration in the images have separation, but if you put separation in FR but in JP it has no separation, no thumbnail appears in FR, and the idea is that a thumbnail photo appears in the application

Hello, I am writing to you again to say to correct the error in the registration of the Colombian Air Force planes and helicopters, there is no photo in Flightradar due to the separation with dash (-) in the registration, the Colombian Air Force do not have separation in the jetphotos database

[Chubaca feroz]

E49430
PT-OFB (instead of PR-ZTO)
BE9L
Beechcraft F90 King Air
LA-200
Private
1982

[guaca]

Air Georgian ZX/GGN went bankrupt and sold some assets to Pivot Airlines (Registered as 2746904 ONTARIO INC.). ZX/GGN is used by Pivot Airlines since June. They have one aircraft registered (a former Air Georgian plane).

ModeS/Hex-code - C03BE4
Registration C-FWRR
ICAO Type code - CRJ1
Airline / Owner - Pivot Airlines
Paint code (ICAO) - GGN
Operator code (ICAO) - GGN

Thanks

I see the modification has been made, however, the "Operator" field is still showing as Air Georgian. Both the Airline and Operator fields should read Pivot Airlines.


Also, the Air Canada Express operator Jazz Air (ICAO JZA) should read "Jazz Aviation". Jazz Air became Jazz Aviation in 2011.

Thanks

Is this the right thread to post about this? I'm still seeing Air Georgian and Jazz Air used..

[elkhorn]

ModeS/Hex-code - A88B8D
Registration: N65N
ICAO Type code - TU206F
Type Cessna 206
MSN U20601729
Airline / Owner - Elkhorn Aviation Inc