Data errors in Flightradar24 aircraft database

[Tanzan]

ModeS: AB92F3
Registration:N845FK
ICAO Type code: C208
Type: Cessna 208B Grand Caravan EX
Airline: Coastal Aviation
IATA: CQ
Operator code (ICAO) CSV

[Tanzan]

ModeS: 080063
Registration:5H-ZBZ
ICAO Type code: C208
Type: Cessna 208 Grand Caravan
Airline: Mission Aviation Fellowship

[ezhatiy]

ModeS: 1533AD
Reg: RA-78765
First flight: Jun 1988

ModeS: 14FC07
Reg: RF-64519
First flight: Jun 1 2011

ModeS: 14FC0B
Reg: RA-64523
Type: Tupolev Tu-214VPU
MSN: 44104023
First flight: Sep 25 2013

[Phil1122]

A07FE8 N131LF
Airline:Allegheny Health Network LifeFlight

[Iberian]

4D02BD
LX-JFD
PC12
Pilatus PC-12/47E
1787
Jetfly Aviation
2018-00-00

[Phil1122]

A3A1F4
N333LF
BK17
Eurocopter MBB-BK117 B1
Airline: Geisinger Life Flight
7226
1990-00-00

A5FFE3
N486LF
BK17
Eurocopter MBB-BK117 C1
Airline: Geisinger Life Flight
7513
1995-00-00

[Phil1122]

For the following aircraft the technical information is correct, however please update the information to reflect the owner/operator.

A5F107 N482LF
Airline: Geisinger Life Flight

A5F4BE N483LF
Airline: Geisinger Life Flight

A5F875 N484LF
Airline: Geisinger Life Flight

A6039A N487LF
Airline: Geisinger Life Flight

A60751 N488LF
Airline: St. Luke’s University Health Life Flight

A2B689 N274NE
Airline: Boston MedFlight

[Tabbex]

0D0A81 (instead of 0D0A3F)
XB-HKA
C340
Cessna 340A
n/a
Private owner

[apgphoto]

VT-IHW and VT-IHT think they are the same aircraft, which is really clever as VT-IHT is not in the database but its flights are recorded under VT-IHW

Where ever you pull your third party data from its totally shit, this probably explains other phantom flights that we have reported previously. Why does third party data override ADSB data that you are being fed?

Here is the flight history for VT-IHW you will see some times its taken off before its landed


India.jpg

[shivakhanal]

Update following Registrations

Registration: 9M-LMT
Airlines: Malindo Air
Paint code (ICAO): MXD
Operator: Malindo Air
Operator code (ICAO): MXD

[shivakhanal]

Fleet of Malindo Air (Malaysia) has been mapped as Batik Air (ID / BTK) which is not correct since Batik Air and Malindo Air are different airlines and Operator Individually with their own Fleet. (but they are in same group "Lion Air Group")

So all the Fleet of Batik Air Starting with "9M" which should be changed to Malindo Air (OD / MXD)

So please change as follow to the Registrations Listed below

Correct Detail

Airlines: Malindo Air
Paint code (ICAO): MXD
Operator: Malindo Air
Operator code (ICAO): MXD

Registrations need to be changed

9M-LMF
9M-LMG
9M-LMH
9M-LMJ
9M-LMK
9M-LML
9M-LMM
9M-LMO
9M-LMP
9M-LMQ
9M-LMR
9M-LMU
9M-LMV
9M-LMW
9M-LCC
9M-LCD
9M-LCF
9M-LCG
9M-LCH
9M-LCJ
9M-LCK
9M-LCL
9M-LCM
9M-LCP
9M-LNC
9M-LND
9M-LNM
9M-LNP
9M-LNQ
9M-LNR
9M-LNS
9M-LNT
9M-LNU
9M-LNV
9M-LNW
9M-LNY
9M-LNZ
9M-LNF
9M-LNG
9M-LNH
9M-LNJ
9M-LNK
9M-LNL

[Tyke's Aero blog]

Fleet of Malindo Air (Malaysia) has been mapped as Batik Air (ID / BTK) which is not correct since Batik Air and Malindo Air are different airlines and Operator Individually with their own Fleet. (but they are in same group "Lion Air Group")

So all the Fleet of Batik Air Starting with "9M" which should be changed to Malindo Air (OD / MXD)

Beware the rush!

The situation with The Lion Group is that they still cannot make up their minds what their brand will be. Malindo Air is/was in the process of being rebranded as Batik Air Malaysia and all their new planes are painted in a livery that reflects that. Currently they are still operating under the Malindo Air moniker with planes in all sorts of random hybrid Malindo Air/Batik Air/Lion Air livery combinations. In my opinion the 'operator' field is strictly correct showing either Batik Air Malaysia or Malindo Air. I don't think the database software allows 2 different operator names with the same operator code.

https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/9m-lcp

[shivakhanal]

Beware the rush!

The situation with The Lion Group is that they still cannot make up their minds what their brand will be. Malindo Air is/was in the process of being rebranded as Batik Air Malaysia and all their new planes are painted in a livery that reflects that. Currently they are still operating under the Malindo Air moniker with planes in all sorts of random hybrid Malindo Air/Batik Air/Lion Air livery combinations. In my opinion the 'operator' field is strictly correct showing either Batik Air Malaysia or Malindo Air. I don't think the database software allows 2 different operator names with the same operator code.

https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/9m-lcp

Yes you are correct I am aware that Malindo Air have some of their aircraft with Batik Air Livery so its better to put airlines name as Malino Air (Batik Air Livery), Malino Air (Lion Air Livery) with code of Malindo Air (OD / MXD) Since for individual airlines with their own Fleet the Airlines Code and Operator code should be same. (As per my understanding) so that user can search for the list of fleet of Individual Airlines. The same case is with AirAsia Fleet as well on AirAsia Fleet all Aircraft of AirAsia Group are listed so if i search for AirAsia India Fleet its coming 0 Aircaft

There may be many airlines within a group but fleet of individual airlines should be separated.

Hope I have described well for you to understand what i mean

[Tyke's Aero blog]

Yes I understand perfectly and I can't really disagree with your argument as it does make sense, but I question whether it is worth the editor's effort to change them all back again when the official rebrand to Batik Air Malaysia is "pending".

[8974]

ModeS: 8681B6
Registration: JA73NQ
Type code: B738
Type: Boeing 737-81D
S/N: 39432
Airline: Skymark Airlines(Starry Sky Jet Livery)
Operator: Skymark Airlines