Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Data errors in Flightradar24 aircraft database

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AirMe
    replied
    Why ALL Bombardier aircrafts are now in the database as Mitsubishi? It's totally WRONG! First, aircrafts are not rebranded and second even if this will happen... the new name should be shown only in brand-new aircrafts!
    The same happened with Bombardier C-Series built before the model was sold to Airbus: that aircrafts built and sold by Bombardier should be in the database as Bombardier C-Series.
    Can someone fix this, please?

    Leave a comment:


  • AirMe
    replied
    4BBC73 TC-OCS [NO longer in special livery]

    Aircraft to be blanket:

    South African Airways: ZS-SXA (00B1EF), ZS-SXB (00B1F0), ZS-SXC (00B1F1)
    Estelar: YV3431 (0D82E2)
    Sunwing C-FDBD (C0080A)
    Air Canada: C-GKEZ (C05F92), C-GKGC (C05FAF)
    Singapore Airlines: 9V-SRM (76CE4D), 9V-SQN (76CE2E)

    These aircrafts to be blanket was posted some time ago, but weren't edit:

    Blue Air: YR-BMI (4A09A9), YR-BMH (4A09A8)
    Alitalia: I-BIXR (300069), I-BIXS (30006A)
    Last edited by AirMe; 2020-06-15, 02:39.

    Leave a comment:


  • 40612
    replied
    Originally posted by Huss Z View Post
    ModeS: 7CC466
    Registration **Should** be: 23-8880


    Type: The Airplane Factory - Sling 2
    Owner: Sydney Flying Academy

    The aircraft is showing as registered under 24-8800 which is wrong.
    And the Aircraft is displayed as type Luscombe 8 which is incorrect
    See my original post.
    https://forum.flightradar24.com/forum/radar-forums/flightradar24-aircraft-database/1783-aircraft-to-be-added-into-flightradar24-aircraft-database?p=145940#post145940

    Posting the same thing several times won't make it happen any quicker.

    Leave a comment:


  • Huss Z
    replied
    ModeS: 7CC466
    Registration **Should** be: 23-8880


    Type: The Airplane Factory - Sling 2
    Owner: Sydney Flying Academy

    The aircraft is showing as registered under 24-8800 which is wrong.
    And the Aircraft is displayed as type Luscombe 8 which is incorrect

    Leave a comment:


  • Oblivian
    replied
    Ownership update

    C81CDB
    ZK-TAD
    C172
    Cessna 172R Skyhawk
    72-81546
    Private (Enfield Holdings Limited)

    Leave a comment:


  • Timmae83
    replied
    3D19EC
    D-EIBK
    PA28A
    Piper PA 28-161 Warrior 2
    28-8116197
    Flugsport-Club Neumünster
    -
    -
    1981-00-00

    Leave a comment:


  • bahamabarbarian
    replied
    8A03EE
    PK-PAW
    AT75
    ATR 72-500(F)
    746
    Angkasa Pusa Logistics/
    Pelita Air Service
    PAS
    6D/PAS

    2007-04-13

    Leave a comment:


  • bahamabarbarian
    replied
    43BEB3
    VP-BAB
    B738
    Boeing 737-8JP
    39420
    SmartAvia
    AUL
    5N/ANL

    2011-12-20
    ex EI-FJE

    Leave a comment:


  • 40612
    replied
    Originally posted by Steve6443 View Post

    It doesn't need to make sense to you, it's the german LBA. The plane flies with a German Permit to Fly and does not therefore have a German Registration per se. It is weird german bureaucracy. Just accept it as it is, that the aircraft still has the same hex code but is flying using D-EYFF
    If it's using a Swiss hex, then it's miscoded.

    HB-WYR is deregistered. 4B3C99 is a Swiss hex allocation, fixed to HB-WYR and will be re-allocated to another aircraft in due course.

    It should not be in use by a German aircraft, whether D-EYFF has a permit to fly, a 'registration' or whatever in Germany.

    The database editors will not add it to the database for this reason.

    Edit: correct hex for D-EYFF should be 3D448F.
    Last edited by 40612; 2020-06-12, 12:47.

    Leave a comment:


  • mjb
    replied
    I replied to the add message in the additions thread, but I should probably post it here as well / instead.... ZK-FGC would probably like to be a C172, but it's definitely a C152.

    Originally posted by mjb View Post
    Code:
    C8059A
    ZK-FGC
    C152
    Cessna 152
    15282207
    Private
    1979-00-00
    This one is incorrectly listed as type code C172 on the website, what nomad77 put above is correct.

    Leave a comment:


  • Steve6443
    replied
    Originally posted by 40612 View Post

    'NOT enlisted on the German registry' ... but has a German registration?

    Makes no sense to me.
    It doesn't need to make sense to you, it's the german LBA. The plane flies with a German Permit to Fly and does not therefore have a German Registration per se. It is weird german bureaucracy. Just accept it as it is, that the aircraft still has the same hex code but is flying using D-EYFF

    Leave a comment:


  • Sylfia
    replied
    Originally posted by Sylfia View Post
    Hello,

    Kindly do a correction on our aircraft, as following;

    SSR MODE S CODE : 8A07A4
    A/C REG : PK-ZGN
    ICAO TYPE CODE : B412
    TYPE : NBELL412
    MSN : 34007
    OWNER : PRIVATE OWNER
    OPERATOR CODE : 135-004

    Picture please click on the link below;
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/ycc2cdxbzw...0BODY.jpg?dl=0

    Thank you,
    Regards,
    Sylfia
    --

    Good day,

    I have upgraded my account to Gold subscription.
    Can someone tell me where can I edit the aircraft details.
    Because it seems no one do correction on the aircraft details i mentioned above.

    Please advise.

    Thanks,

    Leave a comment:


  • Huss Z
    replied
    ModeS: 7CC466
    Registration **Should** be: 23-8880


    Type: The Airplane Factory - Sling 2
    Owner: Sydney Flying Academy

    The aircraft is showing as registered under 24-8800 which is wrong.
    And the Aircraft is displayed as type Luscombe 8 which is incorrect

    Leave a comment:


  • AirMe
    replied
    EC-JOU is in the database as 342313 but it flies as with 342413. Could be a database mistake instead of miscode? It never flown with the FR24 hex, and other websites report the actual hex.

    Leave a comment:


  • 40612
    replied
    Originally posted by Steve6443 View Post

    Usually that would be the case but that assumes that it is actually enlisted in the german registry. It is however NOT enlisted on the German registry but is flying under permanent EASA Flight Conditions with a Permit to Fly. The transponder has therefore kept the same Hex code but the actual registration has changed.
    'NOT enlisted on the German registry' ... but has a German registration?

    Makes no sense to me.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X