Originally posted by Slashpage
View Post
I wonder just how much scientific research or analysis this reliable source of yours (or indeed yourself) has actually performed on these 'Chemtrails'. I want to thank you for introducing a topic of interest for debunking (sorry I meant to write debating).
But firstly I'd like to address Mikes 'tin hats.' Mike I tried those hats and had mixed results but ended in a world of trouble. Firstly I donned mine and stood on the ridge capping of the roof of my house and found them to be absolutely useless for seeing any trails. I did however find that if I turned in an anti-clockwise direction and pointed that I could pick up the ATIS from Sydney Airport, however the neighbours called the police who were not amused and I now have an appointment with a phsychiatrist. It gets worse. I dont own a cat so I made one for the dog. You wouldnt read about it but she raced out in a thunderstorm with it on the other night and was struck by a bolt of lightning. Talk about a chemtrail, it almost reached half-way up the nearest gum tree. So I guess to a degree this could be deemed a success. On the ground though was a large black silhouette where the dog once stood which failed to impress the missus or the RSPCA (the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals). I now have a court attendance notice for that.
Seriously, I'm not a scientist but my daughter and her husband are and I ran this past them the other day. To be fair I cant pretend to repeat their scientific debunking here but I can tell you this. I spent much of my youth in areas such as the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area, the Riverina and Cobar/Bourke on farms watching Ag. pilots spraying crops with chemicals. With pinpoint accuracy they would fly in over the crops at altitudes so low I thought they had a death wish (and not from the chemicals). Your quote above 'which fail to dissipate like normal contrails do' is your biggest problem in convincing anyone that these "chemtrails' are anything other than ordinary contrails made up of little more than water droplets crystalising in the still atmoshere at flight levels above about 26,000 ft. They wont dissipate if there are no winds aloft to disperse them or if the temperature 'holds' them as crystals. From up there even when they do disperse they could go anywhere. You had better send a NOTAM to the pilots and let them know they have it all wrong.
The next time you see a 747 flying at 50-100 ft over a city (or country area for that matter) leaving 'chemtrails' let me know. Then I'll start worrying. By the way the last time I was in the cockpit of a 747 there were no controls for spraying chemicals- It's a completely natural phenomenon.
I've taken the opportunity to write to the CIA on your behalf to advise them that they need to tell pilots to spray much closer to the ground and not up where it can be seen and doesnt do its job anyway. (I suppose I'll be getting a visit from them next).
You've also made the claim that it is fact, and yet your link clearly indicates it's nothing other than theory.'chemtrails_conspiracy_theory_geoengineering.html' That's what they call in the classics, 'shooting yourself in the foot'
Regards,
gregg
Comment