Also, we have found something on map 23166 (bottom right) which is a large shape we cannot identify at all.....
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Malaysia Airlines Flight Goes Missing En Route to China - Flight MH370
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
This sounds to me like it "could" be the most probable explanation thus far - http://www.lowyat.net/2014/03/was-th...-200-aircraft/
Comment
-
Originally posted by whatsgoingonhere View PostThis sounds to me like it "could" be the most probable explanation thus far - http://www.lowyat.net/2014/03/was-th...-200-aircraft/
Comment
-
Originally posted by whatsgoingonhere View PostThis sounds to me like it "could" be the most probable explanation thus far - http://www.lowyat.net/2014/03/was-th...-200-aircraft/
Try telling that to anyone who runs an ADS-B receiver...
and 'Depending on the level of corrosion, there would have been a gradual depressurization of of the cabin pressure as oxygen was sucked out of the aircraft. The gradual decompression would have not been noticed by the crew as pressure changes would have been at an acceptable level as the plane climbed to 35,000 ft.'
I think in a modern airliner such a situation would set off multiple alarms that would be very hard to ignore.
Also 'It isn’t known whether the FAA AD above was relayed to Boeing'
well if it contained corrective action then it would have to be approved by Boeing, I cannot imagine an AD would be issued without informing the manufacturer.
These are just some of the obvious errors, I would look long and hard at ALL of the claims before trusting any of them.Last edited by F-EGLF1; 2014-03-12, 10:20.FR24 F-EGLF1, Blitzortung station 878, OGN Aldersht2, PilotAware PWAldersht, PlanePlotter M7.
Comment
-
Originally posted by F-EGLF1 View PostI would not put ANY faith in a report with so many inaccuracy’s, such statements as ' ADS-B isn’t able to track aircraft flying below 30,000ft'
Try telling that to anyone who runs an ADS-B receiver...
and 'Depending on the level of corrosion, there would have been a gradual depressurization of of the cabin pressure as oxygen was sucked out of the aircraft. The gradual decompression would have not been noticed by the crew as pressure changes would have been at an acceptable level as the plane climbed to 35,000 ft.'
I think in a modern airliner such a situation would set off multiple alarms that would be very hard to ignore.
Also 'It isn’t known whether the FAA AD above was relayed to Boeing'
well if it contained corrective action then it would have to be approved by Boeing, I cannot imagine an AD would be issued without informing the manufacturer.
These are just some of the obvious errors, I would look long and hard at ALL of the claims before trusting any of them.
Comment
-
wreckage
I have found these very interesting parts, not only individually inspected but all together as well:
http://www.tomnod.com/nod/challenge/...2014/map/21431
http://www.tomnod.com/nod/challenge/...2014/map/21962
http://www.tomnod.com/nod/challenge/...2014/map/22343
http://www.tomnod.com/nod/challenge/...2014/map/24480
http://www.tomnod.com/nod/challenge/...2014/map/23972
http://www.tomnod.com/nod/challenge/...2014/map/25425
wrecage.jpg
And also this which I am almos sure its fishing boats:
http://www.tomnod.com/nod/challenge/...2014/map/21846
Comment
-
Originally posted by whatsgoingonhere View PostI am average joe blow and you are right I do not know wether these "theories" are correct. I do however look at all seemingly reasonable possibilities. At this point in time, there is a plane missing with 239 people on board - we really have to look at reasonable possibilities. The original script of this theory can be found at http://mh370lost.tumblr.com/?og=1 I would have posted this initially if I had been more thorough in my research, however I wasn't. I would be interested in your thoughts after reading this. With many thanks
The information in the AD has been known for almost a year as it is based on Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0068, dated June 12, 2013:FR24 F-EGLF1, Blitzortung station 878, OGN Aldersht2, PilotAware PWAldersht, PlanePlotter M7.
Comment
-
The aircraft had just completed an "a" check and was lsated for it's next check in June which means that it most likely had the last "c" check 12-18 months ago where the AD should have been proformed. Either way I do believe that if corrosion was found it would have had to be repaired properly
PDATE 5: MAS released one of its most detailed updates yet on March 11 at 1115 Malaysia time (MYT), but it still doesn't have any evidence that points to what happened to Flight 370. MAS says that "no information was relayed" via the Boeing 777-200's Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS), and confirmed that "there were no distress calls" from the aircraft. MAS says investigators "looking at a possibility of an attempt" to turn back. As a result, the search and rescue teams "have expanded the scope beyond the flight path to the West Peninsular of Malaysia at the Straits of Malacca." The airframe involved, 9M-MRO, last "underwent maintenance" on Feb. 23 in the carrier's Kuala Lumpur hangar, and is slated for its next check on June 19. The aircraft has 53,465.21 hours and 7,525 cycles. Here's our related story.
Comment
-
Hi Mike,
I have question in mind, can you please tell me that when we lost MH 370 that time in the sky at FL 360 there was another nearest flight was CES539. Can CES539 pilot can see if there was explosion on MH370? what is the distance between both flights? for more clear myself am posting screenshot also here, Thanks
Untitled.jpgLast edited by bhavlobhuro; 2014-03-12, 17:32.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bhavlobhuro View PostHi Mike,
I have question in mind, can you please tell me that when we lost MH 370 that time in the sky at FL 360 there was another nearest flight was CES539. Can CES539 pilot can see if there was explosion on MH370? what is the distance between both flights? for more clear myself am posting screenshot also here, Thanks
[ATTACH=CONFIG]3519[/ATTACH]
Comment
-
I think the one on this screenshot was a little bit nearer, but I doubt they could see/feel anything.
(near flight mh370).jpg
Comment
Comment